Secularism Exposed

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is characterised with brutal occupation versus a wily but implaccable resistence. Yes, both sides think their right, but that doesn’t mean they are both equal? Though according to the director of ‘Interfaith Youth Core’,  Eboo Patel in the Washington Post, they are!

He unveils his radical idea of how we should be trying to come up with ’rules for a solution’, as opposed to ‘rules of the status quo’, when it comes to the conflict in the middle east between two sides who both think they’re right.  In history, both the Nazi’s and the allies thought they were right, were they both right? Perhaps  we should have been thinking in the way of creating ‘rules for solutions that acknowledge both sides points of view’ when it came to WW2??

The reality is, what justifies someone engaged in a conflict, is justice, but what does not justify someone, is nationalism. The Israelis are not just nationalists, they are ultra-nationalists. Fatah (aka Israel’s proxy) too are Nationalists. But the Palestinians (and Hamas) call for and desire justice.

I think we can see who is in the right here, and who is in the wrong.

We should not be surprised when ‘Muslim’ secularists like Eboo Patel suggest moral parity with people who believe that their heinous actions are justified by Nationalism, since the ‘Muslim’ Secularists too believe in Nationalism! How can they be a people who would ever call for real justice, when their politically expedient criteria for life makes them abhor anything that actually requires sacrifice, steadfastness and patience.

Thus when ‘Muslim’ secularists suggest ‘Rules for solutions’, in truth, they are more like Rules for selling-out…

N.B. Interestingly, ‘Muslim’ Secularists call anyone who dares to remain prinicipled and moral ‘well-meaning organizations’ who then are described as ‘dangerous and destabilizing to [our]community’ which after ‘peace is finally made with the other side, your first battle is going to be against them.’

So we should all  accomodate and make peace with the unjust, but fight and make war with the Just; all for the sake of peace- nice one ‘Muslim’ Secularists!…

It is also ironic that Mr Patel, remarked how:  ”I spent much of the weekend communicating with Muslim and Jewish leaders on the recent crisis in Gaza. Here was my basic question: “Have you reached out to leaders in the other community to find a solution to the conflict?” – though Mr Patel is a Secularist, he has used his faith-orientated organisation to attempt political forays into current affairs. Why can’t secularists just separate Religion from politics? You’d think we wouldn’t have to tell them…

Israel is an illegitimate state. There are many who still live, who lived upon the land now infested with Zionists. Israel is the only cause of strife and problems in the region. The Palestinians, a people who still hold on to hope that justice can be done upon the earth, and their lands and old homes can be restored, yet sell-out ‘house negro’ Muslims condemn them for daring to keep their spirits unbroken in the face of the onslaught.

Hamas fired rockets into Israel after the ceasefire expired, yes – but why is it no one talks about the ceasefire condition that Israel broke, namely, the promised lifting of the strangulating blockade, imposed, I might add, right after Hamas won the elections and got into power. Liberal sellout ‘Muslims’ would condemn the victim for, whilst being strangled to a slow, painful and drawn out death, chose to hit their aggressor with a pinprick. All the while, the House Negro ‘Muslims’ excuse Israel for making a response which, though admittedly disproportionate, was not without ‘reason or cause’. If any intellectual and moral person was in charge of the Gazan people, and saw them slowly dying, suffering from malnutrition or insufficient medical aid, THEY TOO would sanction rocket fire. The is because the rocket fire was never intended to win any kind of military victory, for it is too small, unguided and meagre to achieve anything except media attention. And here we find the real reason behind Hamas’s rocket fire – it was done as an act of desperation, seeking to draw attention to the plight of the Palestinians.

Israel wants the Palestinians not just to ceasefire, but all to do the ultimate crime against a human beings soul…they want the Palestinians spirits to be broken. Just like the Native American Indians who have been relegated to dirt-patch reservations, where they regularly turn to alcoholism or gambling – the Israeli’s want the Palestinians to be herded into unimportant reserves, where they can languish and be forgotten. But Hamas has not only stuck to their non-negotiable demand for justice, but also, they are more democratic then almost all democracies in the world today – they cannot accept the existence of Israel, because their people will never accept the existence of Israel – and ironically, the Liberal ‘Muslims’ who are known for loving democracy more than their own Creator’s (Allah) fair judgement, want Hamas to be politically expedient, instead of morally principled – well done ‘Muslim’ Secularists, another own goal.

The Palestinians have been ignored, and the blockade continued to be enforced – with their options running out, and time running out, and Israel not willing to honour their agreements, there was only one recourse left to them – indeed, which moral person wouldn’t to the same if they were in Hamas’ position? The time now is not for talk of what the Palestinians terms of surrender should be, the discussion we should have, is how to renew our calls for the unity of the Muslim Ummah, awakening of our armies and the final dismantling of the illegitimate entity inhabiting Palestine. The time now brothers and sisters, is to establish what all our hearts and minds have been yearning for, for many decades – the re-establishment of the Islamic Khilafah and the return of an old, tried and tested solution to occupied Palestine – the Salahudeen peace process.